Re: [rt.icann.org #3528] FW: General Request for Assignments (ppp-numbers)

James Carlson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.pppext
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Vernon Schryver writes:
> > Unfortunately, Vern's RFC 3818 doesn't cover ECP assignments, so it
> > appears we're still stuck with expert review.  That means we need to
> > discuss it here and report consensus back.
> 
> My now vague recollections are that 3818 does not mention ECP because
> a similar document was advanced specifically for ECP.  I can't seem
> to find it in the RFC index.

Nor could I.

> > I read through BB84, and it appears to be a key-exchange protocol, not
> > an encryption algorithm.  Also, it appears to work only with direct
> > access to physical media and not with the regular bit stream that PPP
> > itself requires.  Thus, I suspect it may not be really appropriate as
> > an ECP option, though I suppose it may open up a possibly interesting
> > discussion about whether we *should* talk about key distribution as an
> > ECP option.  (Whether of the ordinary algorithmic sort, or the more
> > hand-wavy x-files area-51 "quantum" sort.)
> 
> Where did you read about BB84 for PPP?  

I just read about BB84, not its use with PPP, but it seems fairly
clear to me that since BB84 needs access to a physical layer transport
between peers, it's not *just* an ECP option.

> My first thought when I read the message from Michelle Cotton was that
> someone is playing a practical joke on the IANA.  It is possible that
> someone sane seriously wants to do PPP with quantum cryptography, but
> I'd like to see an I-D or at least something more substantial than the
> short note from Mohamed Ali.

I agree.  It seemed dubious to me.

> There have been some serious quantum cryptography efforts that I'd not
> call hand-wavy x-files area-51, but they've all been a little "academic"
> as opposed to "industrial."  Before the IANA fires up a registry, there
> must be an IETF protocol that would use it.  So where is the I-D?

So, let's have a hum of agreement.  Anyone disagree that we should ask
to see the I-D published before the code point is assigned?

-- 
James Carlson, KISS Network                    <[email protected]>
Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive         71.232W   Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442 1677

_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.