RE: ACFC
James Carlson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.pppext |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Vishwas Manral writes: > You rightly guessed it. It is the "common" case, I was enquiring about. > > I was wondering if cases where we had uncompressed fields even when ACFC > and PFC were configured, we may not necessarily handle it in the fast > path and yet handle it in the slow path. The standards say nothing about "fast" or "slow" -- those are implementation and customer acceptance issues. They say only that it must work. -- James Carlson, KISS Network <[email protected]> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive 71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084 MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677 _______________________________________________ Pppext mailing list [email protected] https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext