Re: ACFC

Karl Fox <[email protected]> Fri, 14 Oct 2005 10:18:57 -0400

Newsgroups	gmane.ietf.pppext
Message-ID	<[email protected]>

Just make sure you don't reorder packets, or things will break.

Karl

On Oct 14, 2005, at 9:28 AM, James Carlson wrote:
> Vishwas Manral writes:
>> You rightly guessed it. It is the "common" case, I was enquiring  
>> about.
>>
>> I was wondering if cases where we had uncompressed fields even  
>> when ACFC
>> and PFC were configured, we may not necessarily handle it in the fast
>> path and yet handle it in the slow path.
>
> The standards say nothing about "fast" or "slow" -- those are
> implementation and customer acceptance issues.  They say only that it
> must work.

_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext