RE: Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greater than1492 in PPPoE' to Informational RFC

"Veera Tubati \(vtubati\)" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.pppext,gmane.ietf.general
Message-ID <DFFA342C89421A4AABB019093ACEA246010757A0@xmb-sjc-22c.amer.cisco.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: James Carlson [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Monday, February 20, 2006 12:54 PM
> To: Veera Tubati (vtubati)
> Cc: Pekka Savola; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [Pppext] Re: Last Call: 'Accommodating an MTU/MRU greater
> than1492 in PPPoE' to Informational RFC
> 
> Veera Tubati (vtubati) writes:
> > > We're talking about a single MTU-sized packet transmitted and one
> > > received on an Ethernet link.
> >
> > Correct, but it could be in the order of 20k or more sessions trying
to
> > come up at once after the outage of a BRAS box. For the broken
clients
> > asking for 1500, it is more overhead to timeout and retry something
> > else. Whatever can be avoided reasonably is a bonus.
> 
> So ... we're worried about a BRAS that is unable to handle the load of
> one extra packet for those 20K clients but that will perform
> "acceptably" when those same 20K clients are all actively using their
> links?
> 
> I don't quite understand, but it sounds to me like a design issue for
> the BRAS and not a protocol issue.  If it wants, that machine could
> sequence the link bring-up so that it spreads out the load, or it
> could just use a more capable hardware platform.

It is clear that is not an issue with the protocol, but seems there are
practical reasons which pushed for the birth of this draft.

Veera

> 
> > May be there would be cases where ISP is sure that their underlying
> > network and clients support 1500 MRU indeed...
> 
> I agree that consenting peers may do as they like, but it's not an
> optimization that makes sense to me.
> 
> --
> James Carlson, KISS Network
<[email protected]>
> Sun Microsystems / 1 Network Drive         71.232W   Vox +1 781 442
2084
> MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757   42.496N   Fax +1 781 442
1677

_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.