Re: [Int-area] PPP-to-ethernet

Taking this to the pppext mailing list.

- Mark

Derick Winkworth wrote:
>
> All:
>
>  
>
> Mulitple router vendors have a feature in which you can essentially 
> "bridge" a PPP link to an ethernet link. Cisco calls this feature 
> "local-switching." Juniper calls it "translational cross-connects."
>
>  
>
> I find that both of these vendors implementations have their 
> shortcomings, and I think there could be some benefit to creating a 
> standard for accomplishing this. I am not aware of any standard for 
> doing this.
>
>  
>
> My thought was essentially using the address field as defined in RFC 
> 1662. Differing addresses in this field would be used by the 
> translating router to forward traffic to differing neighboring routers 
> on the ethernet segment. So there would effectively be a 
> PPP-address-TO-Ethernet-MAC table. Neighboring routers would be 
> discovered via IGMP or IRDP (as Cisco kind of does it today, but "not 
> really") on the ethernet segment. Routers responding would have PPP 
> addresses created for them in a state-table, which is link-scoped. So 
> there would be a different table for every PPP link.
>
>  
>
> At the IP layer, the remote-end PPP device would obviously have an 
> address that is native to the IP subnet of the ethernet link.
>
> Anyway, anyone have any thoughts on this?
>
>  
>
> Derick
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>  
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Looking for last minute shopping deals? Find them fast with Yahoo! 
> Search. 
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/evt=51734/*http://tools.search.yahoo.com/newsearch/category.php?category=shopping> 
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> Int-area mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/int-area
>   

_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext