Re: [Technical Errata Reported] RFC2661 (2049)

> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC2661,
> "Layer Two Tunneling Protocol "L2TP"".
> 
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=2661&eid=2049
> 
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Technical
> Reported by: Wang Haojian <[email protected]>
> 
> Section: 1.2
> 
> Original Text
> -------------
> DSLAM
> 
> Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) Access Module
> 
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> DSLAM
> 
> Digital Subscriber Line (DSL) Access Multiplexer
> 
> Notes
> -----
> I think 'Multiplexer' is more appropriate
> 
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.

I think that classifying this as a technical error may be stretching it a
bit, but I have no problem w/the change.

> 
> --------------------------------------
> RFC2661 (draft-ietf-pppext-l2tp-16)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : Layer Two Tunneling Protocol "L2TP"
> Publication Date    : August 1999
> Author(s)           : W. Townsley, A. Valencia, A. Rubens, G. Pall, G.
> Zorn, B. Palter
> Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
> Source              : Point-to-Point Protocol Extensions
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG
> _______________________________________________
> Pppext mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext


_______________________________________________
Pppext mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pppext