Re: IMPORTANT: Strategy for VPN work in IETF

Ananth,

Friday, May 9, 2003, 8:51:56 AM, Nagarajan, Ananth [NTWK SVCS] wrote:
> I think I agree with Jeremy here. After thinking about the proposed
> split for some time, I realized that (as I said earlier) it would
> have made more sense if this was done as soon as L2VPN/PWE3-related
> stuff was brought into the WG.

Isn't later better than never?

> I also feel that there are several "generic" documents, in addition
> to the ones I brought up on this thread some time ago, and it will
> become increasingly complex to decide where those kind of documents
> would fit.

Please list those documents.

> My preference is to schedule two sessions at Vienna, and spend some
> time discussing this, before any decision is made.

I'll address this in my answer to Fabio.

> PS: Another potential problem that would happen is having to
> subscribe to both the l2 and l3 vpn mailing lists and getting
> duplicate emails everytime a generic issue is discussed.

I was under impression that modern e-mail clients had tools to
deal with this :)

Alex