RE: On BGP and VPLS

"Rick Wilder" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ppvpn
Message-ID <6B25E083A064374CA3D2FAB305CFAF7A03C46F@m-va-bsod03.add0.masergy.com>
 
Kireeti,
 
Apparently my previous message was in error in linking the planning to spllit the group with the delay in deciding on working group status of documents. 
 
We have planned a conference on Monday which may resolve other WG issues independent of  reorganization plans.
 
Rick

	-----Original Message----- 
	From: Kireeti Kompella [mailto:[email protected]] 
	Sent: Fri 5/9/2003 5:36 PM 
	To: [email protected]; Rick Wilder; [email protected] 
	Cc: [email protected] 
	Subject: RE: On BGP and VPLS
	
	

	Hi Rick,
	
	> Regarding the last part of your message, the working group chairs have
	> been asked to hold off of declarations of consensus on drafts in the
	> wake of discussions of re-organizing (ie. splitting) of the group.
	
	What's the rationale for holding off declarations of consensus?  This
	decision is two weeks overdue, and the split (if it happens) could take
	several more weeks.
	
	It would be a complete travesty if a simple consensus call took weeks
	but a major decision like a split of the WG was completed in a hurry --
	for one, it would suggest that the split was preordained, and not a
	joint WG decision, a point that Bilel was seeking clarification on.
	
	Kireeti.
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.