Re: vpls scaling question
Loa Andersson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ppvpn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Steve, just to make sure we are on the same field. For me a vpls is a service I as an oprator offer a customer, could you please give me a scenario where that customer would need 10,000,000 VLANs. If you are talikng about number of vpls's in the operator network, 10,000,000 "service instances" is not a problem, in fact it would be a blessing :) /Loa Steven.Wright wrote: > to clarify the INTRA- AS vpls case > I would like to better understand the expected capabilities of INTRA-AS > vpls vs a network of Ethernet switches. > > What is the scaling objective for vpls ? > Current generation Ethernet switches have evolved from the 4096 > VLAN/network to 4096 VLAN/port. Scale limits on SP Ethernet networks > are typically driven by other factors e.g. MAC address table size, > issues with multicast etc. > > Is vpls intended to tackle any of those scale constraints ? or to put it > another way... > Current Ethernet switch networks can support on the order of 10,000 VLAN > service instances. Will vpls enable scaling to the 10,000,000 or so > service instances/AS necessary to enable Ethernet as a residential service ? > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > *From:* Steven.Wright [mailto:[email protected]] > *Sent:* Wednesday, April 23, 2003 5:04 PM > *To:* *Subject:* vpls scaling question > > vpls is proposed as a mechanism to enable large-scale Ethernet networks. > Can anyone quantify for me at what stage flat Ethernet networks > break and vpls is required ? > i.e what should the decision criteria be to convert an Ethernet > network to a vpls network ? > Steven Wright > BellSouth > -- /Loa mobile + 46 739 81 21 64 email: [email protected]