Re: Draft charter for L3VPN

Yakov Rekhter <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ppvpn
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Alex,

> Folks-
> 
> It is taking longer than I anticipated to set up the mailing lists, so
> I am sending the proposed WG charters to this list. These are
> _drafts_, so are likely to need more fine-tuning. Below is the
> proposed charter for L3VPN. The one on L2VPN is in a separate message.
> Comments welcome.

Why the list of documents does not include "Using BGP as an Auto-Discovery 
Mechanism for Network-based VPNs" (draft-ietf-ppvpn-bgpvpn-auto-04.txt) ?

Yakov. 

> 
> --
> Alex
> 
> Layer 3 Virtual Private Networks (l3vpn)
> 
> Chair(s): <under discussion>
> 
> Area Director(s):
>    Thomas Narten <[email protected]>
>    Erik Nordmark <[email protected]>
> 
> Area Advisor:
>    Thomas Narten <[email protected]>
> 
> Technical Advisor:
>    Alex Zinin <[email protected]>
> 
> Description of Working Group:
> 
> This working group is responsible for defining and specifying a
> limited number of solutions for supporting Layer-3 (routed)
> Virtual Private Networks (L3VPNs).
> 
> The WG is responsible for standardization of the following solutions:
> 
>    1. BGP/MPLS IP VPNs (based on RFC 2547)
>    2. IP VPNs using Virtual Routers
>    3. CE-based VPNs using IPSEC
> 
> As part of this effort the WG will work on the following tasks
> (additional work items will require rechartering):
> 
>    1. Requirements and framework for Layer 3 VPNs
>    2. Solution documents for each approach listed above (including
>       applicability statements)
>    3. MIB definitions for each approach
>    4. Security mechanisms for each approach
> 
> Multicast support and Inter-AS considerations are excluded from the charter 
> at this time. They may be considered for inclusion in an updated charter 
> at a later time. Future work items may also include OAM support.
> 
> As a general rule, the WG will not create new protocols, but will provide 
> functional requirements for extensions of the existing protocols that will 
> be discussed in the protocol-specific WGs.
> 
> WG Milestones (optimistic):
> 
> Dec 2002 Submit L3 VPN Requirements Document to IESG for publication as Info
>          (completed)
> Dec 2002 Submit L3 VPN Framework Document to IESG for publication as Info
>          (completed)
> Aug 2003 Submit L3 VPN Security Analysis to IESG for publication as Info
>          (draft-fang-ppvpn-security-framework-00)
> Aug 2003 Submit BGP/MPLS VPNs specification and AS to IESG for publication as
 PS
>          (draft-ietf-ppvpn-rfc2547bis-03, draft-ietf-ppvpn-as2547-01)
> 
> Sep 2003 Submit CE-based specification and AS to IESG for publication as PS
>          (draft-ietf-ppvpn-ce-based-03)
> Sep 2003 Submit Virtual Router specification and AS to IESG for publication a
s PS
>          (draft-ietf-ppvpn-vpn-vr-03, draft-ietf-ppvpn-as-vr-01)
> Oct 2003 Submit VPN MIB Textual Conventions to IESG for publication as PS
>          (draft-ietf-ppvpn-tc-mib-02)
> Oct 2003 Submit MPLS BGP MIB to IESG for publication as PS
>          (draft-ietf-ppvpn-mpls-vpn-mib-05)
> Oct 2003 Submit VR MIB to IESG for publication as PS
>          (draft-ietf-ppvpn-vr-mib-04)
> 
> Dec 2003 Submit specification of using IPSEC for PE-PE encapsulation in BGP/M
PLS VPNs to IESG
>          for publication as PS
>          (draft-ietf-ppvpn-ipsec-2547-03)
> Jan 2003 Submit specification of using GRE for PE-PE encapsulation in BGP/MPL
S VPNs to IESG
>          for publication as PS
>          (draft-ietf-ppvpn-gre-ip-2547-02)
> 
> Jan 2003 Submit specification of CE Route Authentication to IESG for publicat
ion as PS
>          (draft-ietf-ppvpn-l3vpn-auth-03)
> 
> 
>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.