Re: [PWE3] Re: IMPORTANT: Strategy for VPN work in IETF

Loa Andersson <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ppvpn,gmane.ietf.pwe3
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Yakov,

just because something is "too big", you don't need to split each and
every atom.
"logical extremes" does not very often make sense in disucssion on
how to organize a work load, we should look for opitmization

in this context "splitting" makes perfetly sense

/Loa

Yakov Rekhter wrote:
< snip >
> 
> Agreed. In fact, if the justification for splitting the PPVNP WG
> into two is to allow discussion for L3 services, then following
> the same line of reasoning there should be not one, but two L2 VPN
> WGs, one for L2 VPN services (other than VPLS), and one for VPLS.
> Yet, the IESG said nothing about having two L2 VPN WGs. Perhaps the 
> IESG would be kind enough to explain this inconsistency.
> 
> 
>>In that respect, creating a new l2vpn wg will not make the situation any 
>>better.
> 
> 
> Agreed.
> 
> Yakov.
> 
> 
> 
> 


-- 
/Loa

mobile + 46 739 81 21 64
email: [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.