Re: [PWE3] Re: IMPORTANT: Strategy for VPN work in IETF
Loa Andersson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ppvpn,gmane.ietf.pwe3 |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Yakov, just because something is "too big", you don't need to split each and every atom. "logical extremes" does not very often make sense in disucssion on how to organize a work load, we should look for opitmization in this context "splitting" makes perfetly sense /Loa Yakov Rekhter wrote: < snip > > > Agreed. In fact, if the justification for splitting the PPVNP WG > into two is to allow discussion for L3 services, then following > the same line of reasoning there should be not one, but two L2 VPN > WGs, one for L2 VPN services (other than VPLS), and one for VPLS. > Yet, the IESG said nothing about having two L2 VPN WGs. Perhaps the > IESG would be kind enough to explain this inconsistency. > > >>In that respect, creating a new l2vpn wg will not make the situation any >>better. > > > Agreed. > > Yakov. > > > > -- /Loa mobile + 46 739 81 21 64 email: [email protected]