Re: WG split: why and how?

"Rajiv Papneja" <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ppvpn
Message-ID <004101c3195a$78281670$02c1d541@WORKGROUP>
RE: WG split: why and how?Same here. I offer my full support for Marco and his great contribution to the WG. 
  -Rajiv
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Bilel Jamoussi 
  To: 'Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS' ; 'Alex Zinin' ; '[email protected]' 
  Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 10:52 PM
  Subject: RE: WG split: why and how?


  BNJ> Folks, 

  BNJ> I also believe Marco has done a very good job managing the PPVPN WG. 
  BNJ> If you share this "vote of confidence" please voice it to the list. 

  BNJ> Bilel. 

  -----Original Message----- 
  From: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS [mailto:[email protected]] 
  Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 3:33 PM 
  To: Alex Zinin; [email protected] 
  Cc: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS 
  Subject: RE: WG split: why and how? 

  <clip> 

  Granted that there is a large number of tasks and documents to manage, which is one reason why work has not been completed.  However, this problem has only recently been identified for discussion on the list, and apparently has not been discussed to any great extent with the WG chairs (Marco's input).  

  The PPVPN chairs have ably managed the large workload, e.g., see Marco's very thorough update on 'PPVPN WG Status' at IETF-56  <clip>

  Jerry
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.