RE: WG split: why and how?

Agree on the excellent work being done by the current WG. Should be allowed
to continue and progress.
 
Rgds 
Shashi Kiran 

-----Original Message-----
From: Rajiv Papneja [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 7:18 AM
To: Jamoussi, Bilel [BL60:1A00:EXCH]; 'Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS'; 'Alex
Zinin'; [email protected]
Subject: Re: WG split: why and how?


Same here. I offer my full support for Marco and his great contribution to
the WG. 
  -Rajiv

----- Original Message ----- 
From: Bilel Jamoussi <mailto:[email protected]>  
To: 'Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS' <mailto:[email protected]>  ; 'Alex Zinin'
<mailto:[email protected]>  ; '[email protected]'
<mailto:'[email protected]'>  
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 10:52 PM
Subject: RE: WG split: why and how?


BNJ> Folks, 

BNJ> I also believe Marco has done a very good job managing the PPVPN WG. 
BNJ> If you share this "vote of confidence" please voice it to the list. 

BNJ> Bilel. 

-----Original Message----- 
From: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]> ] 
Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 3:33 PM 
To: Alex Zinin; [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>  
Cc: Ash, Gerald R (Jerry), ALABS 
Subject: RE: WG split: why and how? 

<clip> 

Granted that there is a large number of tasks and documents to manage, which
is one reason why work has not been completed.  However, this problem has
only recently been identified for discussion on the list, and apparently has
not been discussed to any great extent with the WG chairs (Marco's input).  

The PPVPN chairs have ably managed the large workload, e.g., see Marco's
very thorough update on 'PPVPN WG Status' at IETF-56  <clip>

Jerry