Re: Draft charter for L3VPN: Internet transparency

Alex Zinin <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ppvpn
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Eric,

Alex>> Is this specific to the case of 2547 only or generic to all L3
Alex>> mechanisms? If the former, I would rather not like the charter to say
Alex>> so.

> I think this  applies to all the schemes.  Even  the CE-based schemes aren't
> viable, in my opinion, over the  public Internet because issues of QoS, SLA,
> and accountability really  prevent a company from using  the public Internet
> as the backbone for its intranet. 

I understand your position. I'd like to see more opinions here.

Alex>> As for rejecting the 2547-related specs, I think it would be very
Alex>> useful if the applicability statement highlighted the detail about
Alex>> cooperating SPs and state that Internet transparency is a non-goal.

> The AS already says (in section 1, Introduction): 

Yep, this is good, I think.

Alex
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.