Re: Draft charter for L3VPN: Internet transparency
Alex Zinin <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ppvpn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Eric, Alex>> Is this specific to the case of 2547 only or generic to all L3 Alex>> mechanisms? If the former, I would rather not like the charter to say Alex>> so. > I think this applies to all the schemes. Even the CE-based schemes aren't > viable, in my opinion, over the public Internet because issues of QoS, SLA, > and accountability really prevent a company from using the public Internet > as the backbone for its intranet. I understand your position. I'd like to see more opinions here. Alex>> As for rejecting the 2547-related specs, I think it would be very Alex>> useful if the applicability statement highlighted the detail about Alex>> cooperating SPs and state that Internet transparency is a non-goal. > The AS already says (in section 1, Introduction): Yep, this is good, I think. Alex