RE: [PWE3] Re: IMPORTANT: Strategy for VPN work in IETF

	I agree Loa. The argument doesn't make much sense.
I think the point is to optimize the work load not
create administravia.

	--Tom


> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On 
> Behalf Of Loa Andersson
> Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 1:52 AM
> To: Yakov Rekhter
> Cc: Hamid Ould-Brahim; Thomas Narten; Alex Zinin; 
> [email protected]; [email protected]; Wijnen, Bert (Bert); 
> Peterson, Jon; Allison Mankin
> Subject: Re: [PWE3] Re: IMPORTANT: Strategy for VPN work in IETF
> 
> 
> Yakov,
> 
> just because something is "too big", you don't need to split 
> each and every atom. "logical extremes" does not very often 
> make sense in disucssion on how to organize a work load, we 
> should look for opitmization
> 
> in this context "splitting" makes perfetly sense
> 
> /Loa
> 
> Yakov Rekhter wrote:
> < snip >
> > 
> > Agreed. In fact, if the justification for splitting the 
> PPVNP WG into 
> > two is to allow discussion for L3 services, then following the same 
> > line of reasoning there should be not one, but two L2 VPN 
> WGs, one for 
> > L2 VPN services (other than VPLS), and one for VPLS. Yet, the IESG 
> > said nothing about having two L2 VPN WGs. Perhaps the IESG would be 
> > kind enough to explain this inconsistency.
> > 
> > 
> >>In that respect, creating a new l2vpn wg will not make the 
> situation 
> >>any
> >>better.
> > 
> > 
> > Agreed.
> > 
> > Yakov.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> -- 
> /Loa
> 
> mobile + 46 739 81 21 64
> email: [email protected]
> 
> _______________________________________________
> pwe3 mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/pwe3
>