Re: Draft charter for L2VPN

Matt> I'd  like  to  include  an   objective  that  the  VPLS  services  are
Matt> transparent to higher layer protocols (e.g. really emulated a LAN) 

I  would  be  opposed to  this  as  a  charter  requirement.  This  kind  of
requirement can  easily get you into a  situation in which you  end up doing
90% of the  work to handle a 1% problem.  Given  a particular solution which
doesn't quite meet this requirement, the WG should be able to decide whether
the solution comes  close enough or not; this  shouldn't be predetermined by
the charter.