Re: Draft charter for L3VPN

Tuesday, May 13, 2003, 11:13:17 AM, Bilel Jamoussi wrote:
> Alex, not sure what you mean by "L2 or L3"? 

L2vpn or L3Vpn proposed WG charters.

Tuesday, May 13, 2003, 3:00:08 PM, Hamid Ould-Brahim wrote:
>> Because I wanted to hear opinions on where it should go: L2 or L3,
> Unfortunately, it's neither L2 or L3, it's L2+L3.

It's about which WG it would be "hosted" in.

> I really think 
> (if wg split happens), that the new re-org needs to leave room
> for potential l2+l3 work/common mechanisms.

Noted.

>> and whether it should be in the first set of documents a specific
>> WG should work on or not.
> Not sure I understand that part. It is already a working group
> document. 

Indeed, and that part is not changed (i.e., we should not revisit
that decision). It is about when the WG should do the LC and submit
it to the IESG, i.e. a mere planning issue.

Alex