Re: decisions on L2 solutions documents
Loa Andersson <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ppvpn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Rick, the question from Hamid is what I should call "loaded". The real issue here is (evn if you felt you had the wg support from the mailing list at the time, which I don't know), that the issues the AD / wg chair discussion should be made available to the list/wg. Review results may change how you feel about making things wg doc or not, even if they come form ADs :) Mailing list discussion of those review results may lift or confirm those conserns. /Loa Hamid Ould-Brahim wrote: > Rick, > > > > > - GVPLS/LPE draft-radoaca-ppvpn-gvpls-01.txt : This draft is > > not made a WG document at this time. Several questions have > > come up regarding this document during discussions between > > the ADs and WG chairs. In order to make an informed decision, > > these questions will be posted shortly to begin a discussion. > > > > In your opinion as ppvpn chair was there consensus on the mailing > list that this draft should advance to WG doc status? > > Hamid. > -- /Loa mobile + 46 739 81 21 64 email: [email protected]