Re: Draft charter for L2VPN
Eric Rosen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ppvpn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Cheng-Yin> If existing routers and bridges cannot expect an emulated LAN Cheng-Yin> service, and cannot work properly using VPLS, how useful are the Cheng-Yin> solutions then? Nobody said that existing routers and bridges should not be able to work properly with VPLS. What is at issue is the extent to which this requires absolutely perfect emulation. Cheng-Yin> I am afraid the WG may not be producing useful work. Suppose the WG produced something which only handled 99.9% of the existing base. Would this be "not useful"?