RE: Draft charter for L2VPN

I'm neutral on IPLS (let the debate continue) but I certainly agree that 
ARP meditation is important and should be included in the WG charter 
(whether there's one or two WGs, it should still be in there as a L2 work 
item).

Thanks,
Andy

--------

At 5/14/2003 03:40 PM -0400, [email protected] wrote:
>yes...definitely include both...
>
>/bb
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Eric Rosen [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 1:34 PM
>To: Alex Zinin
>Cc: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: Draft charter for L2VPN
>
>Two  L2VPN  charter issues  that  come up  frequently  are  (a) whether 
>ARP Mediation  (for  allowing  IP traffic  on  a  p2p  link between  two 
>unlike attachment  circuits) falls  into the  charter,  and (b)  whether 
>IPLS (for allowing LAN-like connectivity among a  set of IP routers, 
>without requiring MAC learning,  BPDUs, etc.)  falls into 
>the  charter.  If there  is actually going to  be an L2VPN charter, 
>I'd  like to see this  settled, preferably in favor of including these efforts.