RE: vpls scaling question
"Steven.Wright" <[email protected]> Tue, 20 May 2003 10:24:39 -0400
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ppvpn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <DDA33D0260634241B611579903A174160221353D@bremoclg> |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Joris wils [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Monday, May 12, 2003 2:16 PM > To: 'Wright, Steven'; 'Loa Andersson' > Cc: '[email protected]' > Subject: RE: vpls scaling question > > > Steve, > > Questions for you: > a) Why does each household need its own VLAN? Why can a set > of household > not share a vlan, each household with its own, possibly > statically assigned, > MAC addresses? > isolate each customer in their own VLAN > b) If each household must have its own VLAN, then are such > VLANs usually > point2point Ethernet circuits to an Internet router? It is > far easier to > handle very large numbers of point2point circuits, than very > large numbers > of multipoint VLANs. > I expect mostly pt-pt but not all pt-pt > Cheers, > Joris > > >