Re: call for discussion on draft-heinanen-radius-pe-discovery-03. txt

Neil,


[email protected] wrote:
> All,
> 
> I agree with the remarks of Richard Spencer on this thread which
> (paraphrased) stated that a test of protocol abuse should be applied to all
> candidates being proposed for this purpose.  But why is this 'abuse' test
> suddenly being applied here and in a restricted sense?  I can see far more
> serious layered network architecture abuse happening, but I'll refrain from
> going into this on this thread.
> 


Bernard is one of the main contributors to the RADIUS development, from his
ppoint of view this is not limited, it is applying a tool when RADIUS is
proposed to be used in a new context, which I would think is highly
appropriate.

-- 
/Loa

mobile + 46 739 81 21 64
email: [email protected]