Re: Single vs many solution(s)

Loa Andersson <[email protected]> Tue, 27 May 2003 19:54:24 +0200
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.ppvpn
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hamid,

I think that is wishful thinking. I know that there are issues with
using bgp (kkompella) from several ADs including at least Alex.

Also, being adopted as a wg document is no gurantee that it will
go all the way to become an RFC much less a PS.

If I read your mail correctly you don't seem to think the is a
difference in the problem space they [v,k]kompella address, if this
is the case you'll have to make a very convincing argument to me
as a wg-chair to send both to IESG requesting that they are reviewed
to become PS. I don't see that argument, and I don't even see an
attempt to make that argument.

Note: I haven't discussed this with Rick or the ADs, so their opionions
might differ.

/Loa

Hamid Ould-Brahim wrote:
> Loa,
> 

> 
> a) Are there strong *technical* issues with kkompella proposal?
> 
>   There was a debate, the draft is now WG document so I assume
>   the chairs and ADs concluded that there are no major technical issues
>   stopping the WG to work on the proposal. So let's move on from
>   that item.



-- 
/Loa

mobile + 46 739 81 21 64
email: [email protected]