Re: VPLS model for L2VPN Framework document
Muneyoshi Suzuki <[email protected]> Fri, 30 May 2003 13:27:37 +0900 (JST)
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ppvpn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> The way the framework document is written, it seems to suggest that an > "emulated LAN" is the as a "VPLS instance", which in turn suggests that a > single MSTP instance cannot govern multiple VPLS instances. So I just > wanted to make it clearer that an emulated LAN could consist of a set of > VPLS instances plus an MSTP instance; I think this would remove Mick's and > Norm's objection. It seems to me, something is still confusing. What is different between emulated LAN and VPLS instance? Could you clarify this? Regarding the framework model, if a single PE contains multiple logical Bridges, a single VPLS Forwarder cannot be shared by Bridges. In this case, a PE must contain multiple logical Bridges and VPLS Forwarders. Each Bridge may have a single MSTP instance, and the instances interwork through VPLS Forwarders. I can't see any problem in this model. (Needless to say, if the VPLS Forwarders is supported by full mesh, there is a big issue ;-) Thanks, Muneyoshi Suzuki Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corp.