RE: VPLS model for L2VPN Framework document
[email protected] Fri, 30 May 2003 08:47:43 +0100
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.ppvpn |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <B5E87B043D4C514389141E2661D255EC019C0DE7@i2km41-ukdy.domain1.systemhost.net> |
Ali > Or we can say "SP untagged packets - e.g., BPDUs". I still don't think that the above gives enough clarification. Packets are only tagged between trunk ports. An operator may have access ports connecting to different management networks that belong to different VLANs, e.g. VLAN 100 for management application X, and VLAN 200 for management application Y. Now, both of these access ports will receive untagged SP packets, but they will be destined for different VLANs. Both sets of SP untagged packets could not be sent over the same 'untagged VPLS instance' as they belong to different VLANs. Richard