RE: New I/D: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-0 0
"Hollenbeck, Scott" <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg,gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <5BEA6CDB196A4241B8BE129D309AA4AF040D84E6@vsvapostal8.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> |
> I am looking forward to your comments and proposals for improvement. <annoyance> It's customary to include an acknowledgements section, especially when much of the text is clearly copied from earlier work done by someone else. </annoyance> I'll review this in more detail when I have more time, but I'm not sure I understand how this can work without also using the ENUM extension [1] I've been working on. Wouldn't an <info> response, for example, also need to return the <info> data described in my draft once the domain exists in the registry? At first glance I think there needs to be some text in your document explaining the relationship to my document. -Scott- [1] http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-enum-epp-e164-05.txt