RE: [ietf-provreg] New I/D: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-0 0

Hi Scott!

Thanks for your feedback!

On Mon, 27 Sep 2004, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:

> OK, I had a chance to take a closer look.  I noticed that you're using a
> 31-character token for the E.164 number.  Why is that?  An E.164 number can
> contain no more than 15 digits per E.164, so why allow a maximum of 31?  For
> what it's worth I used a type like this in the EPP contact mapping:

The idea behind this was to leave it a Registry policy issue (or up to the 
validation method documentation), what format to use, in order to keep it 
as generic as possible. This would allow over-dialing, and characters 
such as "-", "(", ")" as seperators. Furthermore one could 
describe number ranges, e.g. "+41-44-26815xx", with this format.
I do not have a strong opinion on which format to use for this.

> Also, throughout the document s/März/March/

Ouuppps...!
This is due to a bug in the "xml2rfc" package. It used my locale settings, 
i.e. the environment variable "LC_TIME=de_CH" although any output 
documents of the xml2rfc tool are in English. I have submitted a Bug 
Report and informed the Debian maintainer about this issue. I even got 
immediately a patch!
However, this will be correct in the next revision.


cheers,
  Bernie

_______________________________________________
enum mailing list
[email protected]
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/enum