RE: New I/D: draft-hoeneisen-enum-validation-epp-0 0
Bernie Hoeneisen <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg,gmane.ietf.enum |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <Pine.LNX.4.61.0409281501190.3503@machb> |
On Tue, 28 Sep 2004, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: >>> Well, then perhaps a more basic question: why is the number >> needed in the >>> extension at all? You already have the domain name; the >> number can be >>> trivially derived from the name. >> >> For the major part of the cases I agree with you. >> But I am trying to make the extension as generic as possible. >> Im can imagine, that certain validation procedures might need this >> optional field. > > I still don't get it. If the number is needed, it can be derived from the > domain name. Why carry it twice? > > The only scenario I can imagine is one in which some kind of formatting or > some extra information (such as over-dialing numbers) needs to be preserved. > Is that what you have in mind? For example. cheers, Bernie