Re: Comments: draft-sullivan-epp-experience

Hi Scott,

Thanks for your comments.  I particularly like this one:

On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 09:05:14AM -0400, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:

> extension candidacy.  The question, of course, is breadth of appeal.  We
> should talk about it if others think that more granularity should be
> added to the core.  We should defer to an extension if the appeal is
> limited.

That's exactly the feedback I've been hoping for.  If there's broad
consensus that the proposals are ill-conceived or not general enough,
I think that the extension mechanism is the way to go, also.

Thanks much,

A

-- 
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada                        Toronto, Ontario Canada
<[email protected]>                              M2P 2A8
                                        +1 416 646 3304 x4110