Re: 3730 <poll> Text Change Proposal

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 07:09:50AM -0400, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> 
> Didn't you yourself suggest a SHOULD?:

I did (although I regret it in retrospect).  But as I said, I don't
object.

> 
> "Other methods of server-client action notification, such as offline
> reporting, are also
> possible and are beyond the scope of this specification."
> 
> The text in 2.9.2.3 exists to let people know that they can deal with
> clients that don't retrieve queued messages however they wish.
> Something to make that clear really should remain in the document.

Ok, I see that.  I don't have a strong opinion here, either.

A

-- 
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada                        Toronto, Ontario Canada
<[email protected]>                              M2P 2A8
                                        +1 416 646 3304 x4110