Re: 3731bis Submitted

Hollenbeck, Scott <[email protected]> 2005-09-09 20:31
> 3.  Changed text in Section 3.2.1.4 from "At least one <domain:add>,
>     <domain:rem>, or <domain:chg> element MUST be provided." to "At
>     least one <domain:add>, <domain:rem>, or <domain:chg> element
>     MUST be provided if the command is not being extended.  All of
>     these elements MAY be omitted if an <update> extension is
>     present.".

After this goes in, should the RFC3915 also be updated, as section
4.2.5.  EPP <update> Command
currently has:
   Section 3.2.5 of the EPP domain mapping describes the elements
   that have to be specified within an <update> command.  The requirement
   to provide at least one <domain:add>, <domain:rem>, or <domain:chg>
   element is updated by this extension such that at least one empty
   <domain:add>, <domain:rem>, or <domain:chg> element MUST be
   present if this extension is specified within an <update> command.  This
   requirement is updated to disallow the possibility of modifying a
   domain object as part of redemption grace period recovery
   processing.


If I understand everything correctly, an empty <domain:update> should
be enough ?

-- 
Patrick Mevzek
Dot and Co <http://www.dotandco.com/>