Re: EPP to Draft: Next Steps
Patrick Mevzek <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Organization | Dot And Co |
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> 2005-09-21 00:36 > > And when XML did not exist, what was normative in the RFC ? The text, > > no ? :-) > > During the drafting process Scott published the corresponding schema. I was speaking about other RFCs, either not using XML at all, or before XML existed and became widespread for protocols. I know that I probably should have followed the well known rule that the code (here the XML schema) is more authoritative than the documentation (here the text), but I'm still a newbie here. Of course, I have noone to blame, except me, and I just hope things will be even better in the next iteration, with this discrepancy removed so that my error will benefit others. -- Patrick Mevzek Dot and Co <http://www.dotandco.com/>