Re: EPP to Draft: Next Steps

Patrick Mevzek <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Organization Dot And Co
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Eric Brunner-Williams in Portland Maine <[email protected]> 2005-09-21 00:36
> > And when XML did not exist, what was normative in the RFC ? The text,
> > no ? :-)
> 
> During the drafting process Scott published the corresponding schema.

I was speaking about other RFCs, either not using XML at all, or
before XML existed and became widespread for protocols.

I know that I probably should have followed the well known rule that
the code (here the XML schema) is more authoritative than the
documentation (here the text), but I'm still a newbie here.
Of course, I have noone to blame, except me, and
I just hope things will be even better in the next iteration, with
this discrepancy removed so that my error will benefit others.

-- 
Patrick Mevzek
Dot and Co <http://www.dotandco.com/>
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.