RE: secdns draft

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Edward Lewis [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2005 5:27 PM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: Edward Lewis; [email protected]
> Subject: RE: [ietf-provreg] secdns draft
> 
> At 15:41 -0400 10/25/05, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> 
> >Ed, both the dnssec document and the enum document (as 
> another example)
> >*were* described on the provreg list.  The list has remained 
> open partly
> >so it could be used as a resource for continued discussion.
> 
> True, the docs do get mention, but having to dig back 3 years through 
> archives is a bit much.  Especially when the digger isn't aware there 
> is something to find there.

I'd agree if those were the only times the documents were mentioned on
this list.  They're not.

-Scott-