Re: Registry Escrow Information as EPP Spec?
Jaap Akkerhuis <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
[Was stuck in a spam trap, resending --jaap]
From: Andrew Newton <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] Registry Escrow Information as EPP Spec?
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 14:33:55 -0500
To: Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>
On Feb 21, 2006, at 11:40 AM, Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> Aside from the XML problems with the escrow spec, I have the
> reservation that the escrow requirements (or at least, the ones I've
> had to comply with) wouldn't actually allow one to rebuild the
> registry if one were reduced to using it. My own view is that it is
> inadequate, therefore.
Escrow requirements would seem to be a superset of which the database
serialization is one component.
> It seems to me that you _could_ represent most of the
> content of an EPP-provisioned registry simply by outputting all of
> the EPP commands necessary to generate the content of the registry.
Another approach is to use Section 5 of RFC 3981. Of course, it
would be much better with DREG2, which Fred and I are trying to get
out the door.
-andy