Re: a new core command...?

Dear Eugenio,

For our registration system, whatever was not accesible via de EPP 
protocol, was implemented
using WebServices (SOAP).

But, it would probably be helpful to have a list of objects given a 
search pattern :-/

regards

-francisco


Michael Young wrote:
>  Eugenio I also have to support James. This doesn't seem scalable for the
> core protocol, an extension seems the most appropriate place for it.
>
> I could see how in an extension you could address a lot of concerns, i.e.
> queueing a large request, applying policy rules to frequency of these types
> of requests, etc. 
>
> I am looking forward to your I-D.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Michael Young 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of James Gould
> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 8:24 AM
> To: Eugenio Pinto; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] a new core command...?
>
> Eugenio,
>
> We have not had a need to support a bulk form of query in EPP.  This had
> come up several times, but we kept the EPP protocol strictly a provisioning
> protocol and left the bulk information up to reports.  I know that a bulk
> query would be a real problem for a Registry like COM/NET.
>
>
> JG 
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> James F. Gould
> Senior Software Engineer
> VeriSign Information Services
> [email protected]
> Direct: 703.948.3271
> Mobile: 703.628.7063
>
>
> 21345 Ridgetop Circle
> LS2-2-1
> Dulles, VA 20166
>
> Notice to Recipient:  This e-mail contains confidential, proprietary and/or
> Registry  Sensitive information intended solely for the recipient and, thus
> may not be  retransmitted, reproduced or disclosed without the prior written
> consent of  VeriSign Naming and Directory Services.  If you have received
> this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
> telephone or reply e-mail and destroy the original message without making a
> copy.  Thank you.
>
>
>   
>> From: Eugenio Pinto <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 12:02:36 +0100
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Subject: [ietf-provreg] a new core command...?
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I don't know if this subject was already discussed in the past, in the 
>> provreg-wg, but I need some opinions about it.
>>
>> As a Provisioning Protocol I'm wondering if it shouldn't be there 
>> another query command besides <check>, <info> and <transfer> that 
>> would allow us to retrieve all the objects actually provisioned by a
>>     
> repository.
>   
>> In DNS.PT we needed a command with such functionality in order to 
>> retrieve all the domains owned/managed by the current logged user and 
>> we needed to do an extension.
>>
>> My question is:
>>
>> Is it reasonable to include such a command in the core protocol?
>>
>> We have two nearly candidates for that goal:
>>
>> 1 - The EPP <check> command which is used to determine if an object 
>> can be provisioned within a repository.
>>
>> 2 - The EPP <info> command which is used to retrieve information 
>> associated with an existing object.
>>
>> The problem is that the commands above are designed to check well 
>> identified objects each time. If we are not looking for a specific 
>> object we get nothing...
>>
>> As Andrew Sullivan and Frederico Neves already did, I'm working on an 
>> I-D detailing some of the DNS.PT experiences with implementation. This 
>> extension will be there.
>>
>> Once I've completed this, I'll be sure to forward it here.
>>
>> Waiting for feed-back,
>>
>> Eugenio Pinto
>> FCCN - DNS.PT
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>
>
>