Re: Re: a new core command...?
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <20060608110051.GA821@dba3> |
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:34:58AM +0200, Werner Staub wrote: > EPP is strong in terms of executing provisioning requests, but weak > in terms of managing the result. In the early days, it was justifiable > to neglect the management bit, but now, after 6 years, we really should > do something about it. Well, if someone wants to put together a draft outlining such changes, I promise to read it (and comment, if I have anything to say). It seems to me that this is duplicating functionality already available elsewhere, though. I still don't see how a second protocol, well designed for large result sets, is the wrong way to do this. Think UNIX: small tools that do one thing well, chained together. Indeed, that's one of the things I like about the desigh of EPP -- the mappings are more or less independent of one another, and the core protocol only defines what is needed for mappings. A -- ---- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada <[email protected]> M2P 2A8 +1 416 646 3304 x4110