Re: Re: a new core command...?

Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <20060608110051.GA821@dba3>
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 11:34:58AM +0200, Werner Staub wrote:
> EPP is strong in terms of executing provisioning requests, but weak
> in terms of managing the result. In the early days, it was justifiable
> to neglect the management bit, but now, after 6 years, we really should
> do something about it.

Well, if someone wants to put together a draft outlining such
changes, I promise to read it (and comment, if I have anything to
say).  It seems to me that this is duplicating functionality already
available elsewhere, though.  I still don't see how a second
protocol, well designed for large result sets, is the wrong way to do
this.  Think UNIX: small tools that do one thing well, chained
together.  Indeed, that's one of the things I like about the desigh
of EPP -- the mappings are more or less independent of one another,
and the core protocol only defines what is needed for mappings.

A


-- 
----
Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
Afilias Canada                        Toronto, Ontario Canada
<[email protected]>                              M2P 2A8
                                        +1 416 646 3304 x4110
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.