Re: EPP Implementation Test Matrix

Klaus Malorny <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> Here's the first draft of a complete EPP test matrix.  I've tried to
> document the results of testing between two client implementations and
> three server implementations, with all of the software being developed
> independently.  I'm sharing it here so that all can see what was done,
> how I'd like to report the results, and to catch any errors or
> omissions.  Each row should have at least one "X" in it to confirm that
> the feature was tested and confirmed in at least two implementations.  I
> believe we've met that requirement.
> 
> Please clue me in if I've missed anything.
> 

Hi Scott,

I am not sure whether I understand why you send this to this list. We can't 
verify that anyway. For example:


>   <response>                        |  X  |  X  |  X  |  X  |  X  |  X
> |
>     OPTIONAL <value>                |  X  |  X  |  X  |  X  |  X  |  X

How can I verify that? I don't know what DotRegistrar and Key Systems get from 
Afilias and Neulevel, but I know what we get, and because of this, I wouldn't 
put an 'X' here. Your draft (draft-hollenbeck-epp-rfc3730bis-01, the latest I 
could find) says:

          Zero or more OPTIONAL <value> elements that identify a client-
          provided element (including XML tag and value) that caused a
          server error condition.

Well, Afilias and Neulevel put a lot of stuff into the value element, like 
additional error codes, comments and so on, but nothing that identifies a 
client-provided element. If, for example, a domain:info command fails because 
the domain does not exist, I would expect the <value> element to contain 
"<domain:name>example.com</domain:name>" as the content, but this does not 
happen at the two registries.

This is not a special attack against Afilias and Neulevel in favour of Verisign. 
As I am not involved in our transition to EPP at Verisign, I simply don't know 
whether Verisign is any better and eats its own dog food.

Howsoever, I would be surprised if you would do anything but to ignore my 
objections -- as usual.

Regards,

Klaus


___________________________________________________________________________
      |       |
      | knipp |                   Knipp  Medien und Kommunikation GmbH
       -------                           Technologiepark
                                         Martin-Schmeißer-Weg 9
      Dipl. Inf. Klaus Malorny           44227 Dortmund
      [email protected]             Tel. +49 231 9703 0
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.