Re: Question regarding contact:disclose behaviour.

Alexander Mayrhofer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we're moving towards EPP enabling .at, but there is an open question
> regarding how "contact:disclose" should work (we are going to use that for
> hiding certain elements in a legacy whois service). Section 2.9 of RFC3733
> contains the following example about "contact:disclose":
> 
 > [...]
> 
> I'd appreciate feedback on how that was originally intended, and would like
> to see some clarifying text about this in 3733bis...
> 
> Additionally, i'd like to hear from implementors about their currently
> implemented policy regarding this - i think it would be very confusing to
> clients if server behave differently...
> 
> thanks,
> 
> Alex Mayrhofer
> nic.at / enum.at
> 


Hi Alexander,

an earlier discussion with Scott revealed to me that the current approach does 
not allow to set the disclosure of one element and the non-disclosure of another 
element at the same time. Maybe this is the same that puzzled you.

Regards,

Klaus

___________________________________________________________________________
      |       |
      | knipp |                   Knipp  Medien und Kommunikation GmbH
       -------                           Technologiepark
                                         Martin-Schmeißer-Weg 9
      Dipl. Inf. Klaus Malorny           44227 Dortmund
      [email protected]             Tel. +49 231 9703 0