Re: RFC 3730 (EPP)
Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On Mon, Jan 29, 2007 at 09:47:29AM -0700, Owen Borseth wrote: > In particular, what should be the proper response code to a domain > update command where the domain itself exists but the item being > updated for the domain does not exist? The general answer to this, I think, is that it is dependent on the case in question. For the most part, I'd expect error codes in the 23xx series. That said. . . > domain. For instance, what would be the proper response code if we > attempted to remove the "CLIENT UPDATE PROHIBITED" status from an > existing domain that did not already have that status? Hopefully this > explanation makes sense. . . .it seems to me that this case is either a 2304 (because local policy could decide you can't remove a status that isn't there) or e;se a 2002 (because the status has to be set before it can be removed). I'm not sure the current RFCs (or their proposed replacements) gives one a reason to prefer one of these answers to the other. -- Andrew Sullivan 204-4141 Yonge Street Afilias Canada Toronto, Ontario Canada <[email protected]> M2P 2A8 jabber: [email protected] +1 416 646 3304 x4110