Re: Small bibliography error in RFC 4930

Stephane,

This was not an error. On 4/3/07, Scott Hollenbeck wrote the  
following in response to a question from the RFC Editor:

>> (3) 3730bis
>> Is RFC 3066 referenced purposely? Suggest replacing with (or
>> at least
>> adding) a reference to 4646 or 4647.
>>
>
> The reference to 3066 is deliberate.  It should stay that way.


RFC Editor/ah


On Jun 17, 2007, at 12:26 PM, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

> RFC 4930 has several normative references to RFC 3066.
>
> RFC 4930 has been approved by the IESG in January 2007 and published
> in May 2007.
>
> RFC 3066 have been obsoleted by RFC 4646 in September 2006, several
> months before.