Re: Re: EPP over HTTP or simple TCP?

James Gould <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <C34E3C06.17E5A%[email protected]>
We implement the policy rules after the schema validation has passed.  We
don't validate outgoing messages in the server, but our test clients that
are used to certify the server do validate the server responses.

-- 


JG 

-------------------------------------------------------
James F. Gould
Principal Software Engineer
VeriSign Naming Services
[email protected]
Direct: 703.948.3271
Mobile: 703.628.7063

 
21345 Ridgetop Circle
LS2-2-1
Dulles, VA 20166

Notice to Recipient:  This e-mail contains confidential, proprietary and/or
Registry  Sensitive information intended solely for the recipient and, thus
may not be  retransmitted, reproduced or disclosed without the prior written
consent of  VeriSign Naming and Directory Services.  If you have received
this e-mail message in error, please notify the sender immediately by
telephone or reply e-mail and destroy the original message without making a
copy.  Thank you.


> From: Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: Andrew Sullivan <[email protected]>
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:34:12 -0400
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [ietf-provreg] Re: EPP over HTTP or simple TCP?
> 
> On Wed, Oct 31, 2007 at 05:58:00PM +0100, Maarten Bosteels wrote:
>> 
>> We are validating incoming (and outgoing !) EPP messages using Apache
>> xmlbeans
>> and the time it takes is absolutely negligible.
> 
> We do some validation, IIRC, but I seem to recall that there are some
> parts of the spec that the developers decided would be better caught
> later in the chain. This might have been an optimisation in an effort
> to avoid doing the same work twice -- there are policy rules that aren't
> actually part of the XML validation, that you'd still end up having to
> check for other reasons, and I think those cases are caught by the
> policy rules _even if_ they're not valid according to EPP.  (It's also
> possible our developers have since fixed this issue -- I'm not
> involved directly in that stuff any more.  I know we did this once,
> though, because we explicitly stated we weren't going to fix it.)
> 
> A 
> 
> -- 
> Andrew Sullivan                         204-4141 Yonge Street
> Afilias Canada                        Toronto, Ontario Canada
> <[email protected]>                              M2P 2A8
> jabber: [email protected]                 +1 416 646 3304 x4110
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.