Re: Document Progression?
Eric Brunner-Williams <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
Scott, I'm not opposed to progressing the current set. Eric Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > It's been 16 months since RFCs 4930 - 4934 were published as Draft > Standards in May 2007. Is anyone interested in seeing the document set > advance to Standard status? We've long since passed the minimum > requirements for consideration described in RFC 2026: > > "A specification shall remain at the Draft Standard level for at least > four (4) months, or until at least one IETF meeting has occurred, > whichever comes later." > > -Scott- > > > >