RE: Standards Track Advancement Request for EPP RFCs

Thanks for confirming, Lisa.  List archives are here:

http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/

I'm not aware of any reported issues in the archive and I haven't
received any privately.

-Scott-

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Lisa Dusseault [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Friday, October 10, 2008 3:09 PM
> To: Hollenbeck, Scott
> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]
> Subject: Re: Standards Track Advancement Request for EPP RFCs
> 
> Yes, I've received this message.  I haven't had a chance to 
> consult with Chris yet about who would take them -- it was 
> Ted who sponsored them all last.
> 
> Do you also know that there have been no new major problems 
> found in the deployments that were part of qualifying for 
> Draft Standard?
> 
> thanks,
> lisa
> 
> On Oct 10, 2008, at 5:34 AM, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote:
> 
> > Could someone from the IESG please ack receipt of the message below?
> >
> > -Scott-
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Hollenbeck, Scott
> >> Sent: Monday, October 06, 2008 8:43 AM
> >> To: [email protected]; [email protected]
> >> Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; Hollenbeck, Scott
> >> Subject: Standards Track Advancement Request for EPP RFCs
> >>
> >> The EPP RFC documents (RFCs 4930, 4931, 4932, 4933, and 4934) were 
> >> published as Draft Standards in May 2007.  I am asking the IESG to 
> >> review these documents for advancement to "Standard" status as 
> >> described in sections 6.1 and 6.2 of RFC 2026.  There are 
> no entries 
> >> in the RFC Editor errata database for any of these RFCs.
> >>
> >> Thank you,
> >> Scott Hollenbeck
> 
>