Re: Anyone working on 4310-bis?
Ulrich Wisser <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
> So there are registries out there looking to support a keyData interface for > DNSSEC, where the client would pass just the keyData on an add/rem/chg? > Would the DS data be returned in the info response? James, I've heard from several registries considering it. But I have no input about this from registrars. From a registry standpoint dealing with keys instead of ds records makes operations much simpler. We would not return DS data. .SE would put two DS records for each key in the zone file. So returning DS records would mean to return the key twice. With the proposed change we would return the key data in the info command. /Ulrich -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to [email protected]