Re: Anyone working on 4310-bis?

Klaus Malorny <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 04/11/09 16:21, Andrew Sullivan wrote:

>> 7. Clarity around the corner case of a client attempting to add and remove
>> the same dsData or keyData in a single command.  This must result in an
>> error from the server.
>
> Why?  In the mainline EPP specification, if you remove and add the
> same name servers in a single command, it doesn't cause an error.  (I
> know this because misguided registrars used to do it all the time in
> an effort to get the "primary" name server "listed first".)  It's a
> waste of bandwidth, but since EPP is idempotent it should have no
> effect, right?
>

Hi Andrew,

I am quite sure that RFC 5731 and its predecessors do not define how to handle 
this case and that the problem is left as an exercise to the implementor. As I 
regard this as a flaw in the protocol, I would appreciate a statement in 4310bis 
regarding such a state.

Klaus
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
List run by majordomo software.  For (Un-)subscription and similar details
send "help" to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.