Re: Anyone working on 4310-bis?
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 05/11/09 13:16, Hollenbeck, Scott wrote: > I'm referring to XML command structures for which an order can be > explicitly specified, such as elements within a sequence. It's > certainly not a new concept because the specifications have been this > way since the very beginning (the same quote can be found in RFC 3730 > from 2004). If the order wasn't intended to be significant I wouldn't > have used sequences. > > Scott > Well, XML is not a not a command structure but a hierarchical syntax for documents, with XML Schema being one of multiple choices of overlaying it with rules. Anyway, for my taste tying the logic of a high level protocol that tightly to its transport representation is a design weakness, more abstraction would be a boon. But it is wasted time to argue -- it is nothing new that we have diametric opinions on certain topics... Regards, Klaus -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to [email protected]