Re: draft-gould-rfc4310bis-01.txt Submitted for Review

Klaus Malorny <[email protected]>
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <[email protected]>
On 21/12/09 19:13, James Gould wrote:
> Klaus,
>
> [...]

>>  While a standard should be concise, it should avoid implicit
> assumptions in my
>>  humble opinion. Maybe I am wrong, but I can't remember that RFC 5730
> or RFC
>>  3735
>>  say anything about the semantics of not including a certain extension.
> Also,
>>  giving the existence of an extension element any meaning limits the
> forward
>>  compatibility of the extension itself. For example, if someone thinks to
>>  extend
>>  RFC 3915 to report something in addition to the <rgp:rgpStatus>, then the
>>  semantics of the infData element would have to be changed regarding the
>>  existence.
>
> I’m really not sure if there is any defined extension points for an
> extension. I can add some global statement to the draft around the
> meaning of the inclusion or exclusion of the extension, where the
> remainder of the draft assumes that the extension is only included for
> commands or responses when there is data relevant to the extension to
> pass along with one or two examples. Does this meet your request?
>

Yes, this would be IMHO sufficient.

>>  I cannot agree. RFC 2119 says regarding "MUST":
>>
>>  1. MUST This word, or the terms "REQUIRED" or "SHALL", mean that the
>>  definition is an absolute requirement of the specification.
>>
>>  Although I am not a native English speaker, this seems to be pretty
> clear to
>>  me
>>  that there may not exist any hidden assumptions. There is no
> comparative to
>>  "absolute". And it is no excuse for me that other EPP related RFCs do the
>>  same.
>>  Their wording has been the source for confusion more than once ;-)
>>
>
> I personally have not been confused, but does a global statement in the
> draft meet this request as well? I can’t change other RFC’s, so I will
> look to add some clarity in a global statement.

Yes, I think so.

>[...]
>
>
> JG

Regards,

Klaus


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
List run by majordomo software.  For (Un-)subscription and similar details
send "help" to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.