Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis

[email protected]
Newsgroups gmane.ietf.provreg
Message-ID <OFE76855D2.E08B4959-ON802576B7.003ACFE9-802576B7.004174E2@nominet.org.uk>
> Ulrich Wisser <[email protected]> wrote on 26/01/2010 08:01:47:
> Re: [ietf-provreg] XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
>
> in this case I have to agree with James. We discussed changing the URI
> and came to the conclusion that changing the URI will break old clients
> without any need to do so.
>
> But let's have a look on the alternatives:
>
> 1. Server supports only the "old" 1.0
>     - no changes on client or server
> 2. Server supports only the "new" 1.0
>     - only changes on the server side needed
> 3. Server supports both
>     - only changes on the server side needed

That's OK for the server, but thinking about it from the client's point of
view:  How does a client know whether it should use the "old" or "new"
format?
Having the server advertise the protocol version in the <hello> makes it
possible to write a client that can handle both.


Anthony Kirby

--
Nominet UK - http://www.nominet.org.uk

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
List run by majordomo software.  For (Un-)subscription and similar details
send "help" to [email protected]
lmpx.com only provides a reader for public news (NNTP) servers. It is not affiliated with the servers or forums shown here and is not responsible for the content of articles, which is written by their respective authors.