Re: XML Schema versioning in 4310bis
Klaus Malorny <[email protected]>
| Newsgroups | gmane.ietf.provreg |
|---|---|
| Message-ID | <[email protected]> |
On 27/01/10 09:53, Ulrich Wisser wrote: > Hi, > Hi, > when discussing 4310bis we did focus very much on backward > compatibility. Which isn't necessarily a bad thing. But by making the > old style rem command optional we break exactly the one thing we were > aiming for. Hmm. I am quite sure that the current version of 4310bis allows the processing of all valid 4310 requests. > > After some discussions with registrars and my colleagues, we came to the > conclusion that a new URI would be a better solution. The server could > support both versions of the protocol (and therefor not break old > clients) and clients would know which interface to use. Agreed. > > If we change the URI, I propose to drop backward compatibility and get > rid of the old style rem. This is a valid option, but it throws us back nearly to the beginning of the discussion. But if it's worth... > > /Ulrich Regards, Klaus -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- List run by majordomo software. For (Un-)subscription and similar details send "help" to [email protected]