Re: Last Call: draft-gould-rfc4310bis (Domain Name System (DNS) Security Extensions Mapping for the Extensible Provisioning Protocol

Alexey Melnikov wrote:

> Hi Bernie,
>
> Bernie Hoeneisen wrote:

 [...]

>> Please be informed that on the provreg mailing list
>>
>>   http://www.cafax.se/ietf-provreg/maillist/2010-01/maillist.html
>>
>> there is a heavy discussion going on about the shortcomings of the 
>> current proposal. At least two issues have been identified so far:
>>
>> 1) XML namespace (interoperability issues as with the current proposal
>>    the feature negotiation does not work anymore as defined by the EPP
>>    core spec)
>>
>> 2) need for active / inactive flag (e.g. to mark a DS to be used for
>>    emergency key rollover)
>>
>> Before these (and other) issues have been resolved, IMHO it does not 
>> make sense to discuss the I-D on the IESG Telechat.
>
I've just checked my inbox and the editor already sent me a message 
about these issues.

>> The current proposal is still premature.
>
> Ok, I will make sure the issues are resolved before the document goes 
> to IESG.

I also forgot to mention that I actually expect a new revision anyway - 
there are some pending changes due to my AD review.